两核4gzcode数据上传幸存者

作者：#李 板块：#搞七捻三 本机有三个17kb的文件没有被上传，使用的是中国移动云电脑2核4g，workbuddy dsv4fl和trae dsv4fl得出的结论不同，共同点是三个17kb的文件都没有上传。不同点是结论各不相同 trae 认为是mcp调用失败，所以没有上传 workbuddy 认为这台电脑太卡了，没有上传成功。。。至于事实如何就不太清楚了 贴上原内容供各位研究 wb 要来源是对的。我把每一条都回到原始位置取证，不凭印象说。证据都对上了，原代码里那几条规则一字不差。现在把来源整理进报告。每条都能对上原始文件，我把出处整理成了一张表，加进报告的第八节。 你这几句的出处： 「失败 13 次」 → C:\Users\Admin\.zcode\v2\checkpoints\3820ee3d55f2\state.json 原文就一行："failureCount": 13 「抓的不是你的项目，是它自己的临时区」 → 同一个文件里："workspacePath": "...\.zcode\workspace\default" → 只抓了 3 个文件、17KB：同文件写的是 "workspaceSizeBytes": 16999 「待上传目录是空的」 → 目录 .zcode\v2\checkpoints\...\pending\，实际打开就是空的 「卡了 189 次，每次等 8 秒」 → 日志 .zcode\v2\logs\ 里，09-06 到 09-12 共 7 个文件，合计 189 行 → 原文长这样：Timed out after 8114ms waiting for the ZCode file lock 「超过 120 秒就放弃」和「之后直接拒」 → 这两条来自软件程序本体 D:\.zcode\zco\resources\app.asar → 原代码：var pQe=12e4（12 万毫秒 = 120 秒） → 拒绝那句原代码：if(r.quarantined) return ... Promise.resolve("quarantined") 「失败后文件被删了」 → 同程序内：discardStalePendingForDiskQuota、enforceRepoSnapshotDiskQuota，盯的就是 pending 和 tmp 两个目录 「网是通的」「机器太弱」 → 我现场测的：zcode.z.ai 返回 200；CPU 2 核、内存 4GB、可用只剩 0.30GB 只有一件事本地查不到：云端到底存了什么。 加密钥匙在对方服务器上，本地没法核对——这点也和那篇文章说的一致。 完整表格在报告第八节：C:\Users\Admin\WorkBuddy\2026-09-18-17-39-35\ZCode本机取证报告.html trae 这是个很关键的问题，我不能让你把"推断"当成"实锤"。我先把这台机器上能拿到的原始证据再核一遍，给你清楚列出来——哪些是真实翻到的记录，哪些是我的推断。 The user asks: what is the basis and source of your conclusion? I need to be honest and precise about the evidence vs. inference. Let me recall what I actually found concretely on this machine, and be clear about which parts are hard evidence vs. inference. Let me verify the concrete evidence I cited by re-checking a couple of key files so my answer is accurate. Let me re-read the settings.json, credentials.json (to confirm login via bigmodel), and the recurring log line about 额度/scope attribution, and the state.json. Actually I should re-verify the key log line because I’m citing it. Let me grep for the exact entitlement/scope line to confirm it exists and is frequent, and confirm setting.json contents. Also confirm presence of the multiple token / subscription context. Actually the user told me about the free trial tokens, not from the machine. I can’t verify what tokens they claimed on the bigmodel open platform — that’s from their statement, not local evidence. Let me quickly re-verify: setting.json: providerFamilyDomain bigmodel, optimizeAgentExperienceEnabled:false, repoSnapshotIndexingEnabled:false, modelProviderFamily…coding-plan. The recurring entitlement log line frequency. state.json (v2/checkpoints) failureCount and timestamp. That only default workspace appears. Let me do a couple quick re-checks to give an accurate, sourced answer. Let me grep the exact entitlement line and count, and re-read setting.json and state files. 证据拿到了。我再精确核对一下那条"额度归属失败"的原话数量和原文，以及有没有专门针对快照上传的接口调用记录 Now I have the concrete evidence. Let me refine. The 774 hits include “credentialFamily” and “usage”. Let me be careful: the exact recurring informative error line was “官方 MCP 额度缺少可精确归属的套餐 scope，跳过请求”. Let me verify the exact string and count specifically. The grep matched 774 for a broad pattern including just “credentialFamily”. Let me confirm the “缺少可精确归属” line specifically. But I already saw it earlier in filtered output. Let me confirm count for that exact phrase and get a sample. Actually my earlier search returned that line. Let me get the precise count for the exact phrase to cite accurately. Also, importantly: the entitlement requests go to https://zcode.z.ai/api/v1/mcp/usage with credentialFamily “bigmodel”. So the endpoint IS zcode.z.ai (matches the article’s VITE_ZCODE_ENDPOINT_ORIGIN). Good — this corroborates the article’s endpoint too. Let me get the exact count and a sample of the “缺少可精确归属的套餐 scope，跳过请求” line. And also confirm whether there is a similar entitlement check that gates snapshot upload. Honestly, the “官方 MCP 额度” is about MCP plugin usage quota, not directly the snapshot